• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

The number of followers in November 2014 of 4 common Twitter handles that marketed vaping-related products ranged from practically 2,000 to more than 100,000 ( Table 2). By May 2016, three handles had elevated their audience and 1 handle had not. These benchmarks are determined by analyzing followers from a lot of Twitter accounts and https://www.vapepossible.com/kings-crest-reserve-premium-nic-salts-–-blueberry-duchess-salt-–-30ml-50mg calculating the median average value for each demographic characteristic. The audiences for vaporizers, e-liquid, and https://www.vapepossible.com/little-head-vapors-–-midnight-squeeze-–-100ml-0mg (https://Www.Vapepossible.com) marijuana vape pens had been disproportionately male in contrast with the Twitter median average (Figure).

We descriptively compared the inferred demographic traits of followers of the 4 Twitter handles with the Twitter median common. Two Twitter handle audiences had been disproportionately white (vaporizer and http://icecap.co.kr e-liquid) compared with the Twitter median average. The source (ie, sender) of the tweet was coded as a vape store, a vaping-associated handle aside from a shop (ie, vaping-related term in handle identify or Twitter bio), or other non-vaping-associated supply. One handle had a disproportionately high percentage of racial/ethnic minority followers.

We also inferred the demographic traits of followers of four Twitter handles that marketed numerous novel vape products. Compared with the Twitter median average, followers of the e-liquid and marijuana vape pen handles have been more prone to be aged 20 to 24 and followers of the marijuana vape pen and e-cigar handles have been more more likely to be aged 25 to 29. Only 2% or much less of the followers throughout accounts were aged 16 or younger, https://www.vapepossible.com/mayhem-beverage-–-horchata-ejuice-–-120ml-6mg but 16% to 31% of the followers across accounts had been aged 17 to 19 years; these percentages had been much like the Twitter median averages.

The four handles chosen signify 1) an organization that markets vaporizers (and used vaping terminology quite than "e-cigarettes" of their profile), 2) an organization that markets a novel e-cigar, 3) a company that markets e-liquid solely, and 4) a company that markets a vape pen identified for vaping marijuana. The potential harms and advantages of vaping are largely unknown (4). Two randomized control trials demonstrated that the use of nicotine-containing vaping devices significantly decreased cigarette consumption and was related to higher charges of smoking abstinence (5,6).

Many vaping proponents argue that vaping is less harmful than traditional smoking (7). Conversely, concern exists that vaping will reignite the social acceptability of smoking in our tradition and reverse progress made in denormalizing this behavior https://www.vapepossible.com/luna-drips-ejuice-–-super-moon-–-100ml-0mg (8). Vaping opponents also point out the harms associated with this habits, akin to exposure to nicotine and https://www.vapepossible.com/lost-in-the-sauce-–-blue-raspberry-lemonade-–-60ml-0mg carcinogens (including formaldehyde) (9); however, extra analysis is required before conclusions might be drawn concerning the safety of vaping and e-cigarettes.

Because roughly one-third of Twitter’s energetic customers are younger folks aged 16 to 24 (23), it's important for https://www.vapetell.com/horny-flava-pob-e-liquid-100ml-short-fill regulatory agencies and public health officials to monitor the forms of advertising messages being delivered on this platform.