• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A long-standing concept of escorting companies, particularly in the context of supporting individuals with impairments, has been a common practice in various environments including institutions, schools, and communities.

In contrast, this practice has also been subjected to controversy, with many arguing that it perpetuates and undermines social inequalities that are based on privilege.

On one hand, the idea behind offering support someone with a disability is to enhance well-being. However, this 'act of kindness' can also be viewed as a paternalistic move that erodes the autonomy and decision-making capacity of the individual being aided.

Through offering support someone, we are fundamentally stripping them of their self-determination and critical thinking abilities, implying that they are inadequate of managing the world on their own.

This power dynamic is rooted in preconceived notions, with the provider holding a greater level of control and influence over the individual being supported.

Such is a reflection of the social standards that value independence and independence, assuming that people with disabilities are essentially vulnerable and sensitive.

This notion is not only limiting but additionally oppressive, as it withholds people with impairments the potential to participate fully in their cultures and exercise their autonomy.

Furthermore, providing assistance can also be viewed as a kind of systemic exclusion, denying individuals with impairments from participating in certain spaces or facilities that are deemed as difficult to access for them.

Through identifying someone as unsuitable to navigate certain locations, we are basically justifying for them what they can and cannot do, restricting their choices and independence.

Recognizing and overcoming such systemic biases requires a transformation in perspective. We require to change from a paternalistic mindset and towards a more liberating style that prioritizes the autonomy and decision-making capacity of individuals with impairments.

As means participating people with impairments in the decision-making process and seeking their input and feedback. It also means valuing their decision-making abilities and self-determination.

Ultimately, our target should be to create a more welcoming and approachable setting, where people with impairments have the equal choices and alternatives as anyone else.

Such requires a basic change of our cultural norms and attitudes, migrating towards a community of protectionism and facing one that values and promotes independence, autonomy, and fairness.