• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

When it comes to secure messaging apps, two names that are often tossed around are Signal and Signal. While both apps have their own set of claims, the question remains – is Telegram really more secure than its counterpart? In this article, we will take a close look at the security measures of both apps to determine which one reigns supreme in the realm of secure messaging.

To understand the level of security an app offers, let's first look at how user data is handled by each app. Signal uses perfect encryption for group chats and voice calls. However, the encryption keys are stored on the server, which means that the app has access to the keys even if the encryption is perfect. This is in contrast to Telegram, where the encryption keys are generated by the customer and stored on their device.

One of the most notable features of Telegram is its secure two-factor authentication system where it submits phone number verification via SMS or phone call and that it offers a one-time link to set up one new device, but it won't make it easy to set up more. The link is even automatically generated for Signal's official support pages. It doesn't ask the user to visit Telegram's real 3rd party services, in other words it does a way job in preventing man-in-the-middle attacks when getting the link to join the device , After that setup key pair by the user on that devices which removes master key from the server meaning the user owns control of their digital lives'. The setup process also automatically uses the public key to generate a secure session key that's then used to encrypt the conversation. This multi-step process makes it extremely difficult for any third party to intercept the conversation, ensuring that it remains secure.

In contrast, Signal also claims to offer end-to-end encryption for group chats but, unlike Signal, it uses a system called TLS protocol. While it may seem more complicated-sounding than Signal's system, this isn't necessarily a bad thing. TLS protocol does provide better fault-tolerance and verification, ensuring that the server doesn't pretend it is the customer. Moreover, telegram 中文 版 下载 even makes available file menu tab, only users who have accepted the peer can generate the encryption key for file for any individual member conversation. It allows users to have full control over shared information and securely deliver them to the recipient's device.

When it comes to security features such as floodgate capabilities - both apps have strengths in these areas too. Both Signal's features are capable of blocking unwanted messages from that specific messages senders and also doing so via one can also limit his broadcast volume.

Another area that is often overlooked when comparing secure messaging apps is customer service and support. Signal's customer support team is quite active, responding to users' questions and concerns through its official social media channels as well as Telegram itself, However, This doesn't quite hold up against the depth and comprehensiveness of the support - and guides available on Signal's official support pages.

In conclusion, when comparing Signal, it appears that Telegram has a clear edge when it comes to security features, handling customer data, and customer support. Although, Signal has implemented some security-related features that its competitors can't ignore, But That overall leads me firmly to the view of finding that Telegram appears to be more secure than its counterpart due to the complex methods that go toward customer security above.